Recently someone asked me to write down my thoughts on attachment parenting. At first, I wasn’t sure what to say. I mean, I feel pretty attached to my kids and I think they’re kind of attached to me. In fact, for the most part, we really like each other. But a decade ago when they were little enough to be strapped to my back without herniating a disc, I’d never heard of attachment parenting. In fact, I don’t think I was even aware of parenting model options from which I could choose. I’m not saying they weren’t there, just that I wasn’t aware of them.
We had friends who wore their babies on their backs or fronts and had home births and family beds and, in retrospect, I guess they were doing attachment parenting. But I didn’t know that at the time. I thought these friends were alternative and natural, and that held a certain appeal.
But sometimes I thought they were too extreme, like they didn’t understand when enough was enough. I mean it was cool to be pushing the boundaries of conventional parenting guidelines, to have fresh ideas, a new approach, but their system seemed so loose and insecure, with boundaries that could expand and contract to the point of being unrecognizable, of having no shape or definition, like one of those giant soap bubbles.
They would sometimes walk around looking like soap bubbles, all filmy-eyed and droopy because baby had had another rough night or because they were afraid to fall asleep and roll over on the baby. And then, in this exhausted state, they would strap said infant to their weary body, breastfeed perpetually and drag themselves through the day while trying to keep grumpiness and impatience at bay. I actually kind of admired their tenacity.
At the time, we were more into setting boundaries. This can be challenging to do with an infant, but we did the typical non-attachment thing and tried to establish a feeding and napping schedule which I’m pretty sure had very little to do with parenting and a lot to do with survival. We were exhausted and always desperate for more sleep, so we set up a schedule and tried to stick to it.
I guess we did have a parenting rationale for this decision. I don’t think it was conscious at the time, but I think the decision to enforce our schedule instead of letting baby determine the schedule was driven by an underlying belief. We believed that children needed to be taught respect for their parents and that unquestioning obedience was not only necessary, but our right. We saw it as a prerequisite for good parent/child relationships. We established boundaries and rules and did our best to be consistent and enforce them. We believed that deep down the children wanted and needed this, that they wanted to know we were in control because that’s what would make them feel secure. We weren’t consciously thinking about teaching our infant respect, but I think deep down we were feeling like maybe there was a battle of wills going on here and we didn’t want to lose.
We violated quite a few attachment parenting principles. There was a point where we let each of our kids cry at night and didn’t pick them up. After a few nights they stopped. We never noticed that they were less happy or trusting after this. Our interaction with them didn’t seem any different. They seemed just as responsive and communicative. We thought we were doing the right thing. But I still catch myself worrying about it sometimes, wondering if we made a choice which caused irreparable emotional damage.
We didn’t continue breastfeeding until they were two or three or four either. A couple of the kids weaned themselves fairly early, the others didn’t so we made the decision for them.
So the question is, ten years down the road, how are the kids? Did we do the right thing or were we severely misguided? Here are a few observations.
One thing we’ve noticed is that our friends and other parents our age who wholeheartedly embraced the attachment parenting model when we didn’t, have kids that are very similar to our own. What I mean is, they are facing all the same issues and dilemmas in their attempt to parent teen-agers as we are. There are varying degrees of rebelliousness, struggles to communicate effectively, insecurity, low self-esteem, wanting both independence and approval.
When I was a young parent, I considered myself somewhat of an expert on parenting. The truth was I knew precisely nothing about parenting and since no one told me otherwise, I continued in this delusion for quite some time. I believed in the whole ‘love must be tough’ thing because it seemed so counter-cultural and heroic to be defending the last bastion of parenting truth in enemy territory. I blasted a few people with my dogmatic assertions about parenting and now I wish I hadn’t. Because now I know how little I knew and how thoroughly unjesus-like my attitudes and motivations really were. I wish I had been really humble and willing to admit my ignorance and my limitations because I would have learned a lot from people who had already been parents and people like my attachment parenting friends who had a different perspective than me.
I think we’d all be a lot better off if we took this approach as young parents, if we opened ourselves to something other than whatever comes naturally. What came naturally to me wasn’t the attachment model. For other parents, nothing could be more natural. What I’m saying is this. Good parenting has a lot less to do with which parenting model you adopt and a lot more to do with the spiritual condition of your heart.
When your heart is humble, open, listening, you are in a position for God to speak to you because, more than anything else, that is what we parents need. We need wisdom from God. We need to hear his voice.
When we decide to follow a certain system or a certain model of anything, we invariably move away from God. I know it sounds simplistic, but I think he wants us to follow him, not a model. I think he wants us to learn to hear his voice, to cultivate deep dependence on him for every decision we make.
I know it’s a lot easier not to do this. I know from experience. When we’re unsure about how to respond to one of our children, we tend to simply fall back on whatever parenting model we’ve adopted, consciously or unconsciously, and let that model tell us what we should do. It’s completely understandable.
But as great as some parenting models might be, none of them are right about everything. They can’t be. We’re all human and we’re all flawed and all of our systems and programs and models are flawed too.
So it comes down to this. We parents need to beg God to give us his love, wisdom and insight for each one of our children. We parents need to seek a real relationship with God that will allow us to hear his voice and recognize it. I’m talking about a real hard-core relationship, one that’s all about love and passion and commitment.
More than anything else, this is our mission as parents; to be in this radical relationship with God, to hear his voice and respond to it, to live in the truth of it. Otherwise we’re surely condemned to the limitations of the systems and the models we create.
I’ve come to really like some of the things that attachment parenting is all about. Things like giving your kids lots of hugs and kisses and cuddles, things like spending as much time with your kids as possible because you really want to know them and want them to know you, the huge focus on relationships, the move away from what is artificial and embracing what is natural. I love all of this stuff. I really do! I think it’s good.
But I know when it’s all said and done and my last child walks out the door, that even if I had completely embraced every aspect of the attachment parenting model, I’d still be standing here wondering about certain things, thinking I should have done something differently, wishing for another chance. I know this because we live in a broken world and we’re broken people and we live broken lives and no one escapes this.
Our only real hope lies in the transforming power of Jesus which somehow, mysteriously, turns us into people, into parents, through whom the grace, the love and the compassion of God Himself can flow.
One more thought.
There’s something about balance, seeing the good and the bad on both sides of the line, resisting the urge to join one of the clubs and pick up an identity. It’s hard to be balanced. We’re kind of addicted to imbalance because we so desperately want something to define us, something tangible, explainable, something other than God. So we join a party and toe the party line. We really like telling people that we’re democrats or republicans, Bears fans or Anglicans. We want to say ‘we’re doing attachment parenting’ or ‘we’re the parents and we’re in control.’ But living in Christ is always about tension, resisting our desire for labels and dogma and closed definitions, allowing ourselves to be defined by God.